Sunday, June 26, 2005

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Is it a News for ME?

Me and Me.

I am getting dreamy and falling into a reverie.

There is a news for bloggers from the Sarkar. HEEE HEEE.

India government is thinking about e intelligence and doing e thinking.

My dear Sarkar, Kindly first ensure regular supply of electricity and pot and pond less roads. At least in Punjab they are not there since Ravi Sidhu is behind bars.

A news item is HERE.

The most marvellous thing is that this news item has been found on daily reporting on Blogger Buzz. Hey, Do you know, you sitting there on other side of the Atlantic (or the pacific, which ever way you have placed your desk),. I am not sure to complete writing this because I do not know when the electricity would go off.

Yesterday, I remained awake the whole night. The electricity men had slept without attending their duties and I was able to blog and do work on my computer.

I was able to do three things.

First I was able to record some pages which I have been writing when there was no electricity.

Secondly, I was able to post a tabulation in HTML under heading "A Trial" on one of my inactive blog. I do not know much about HTML. But I am sure, if someone look at the work, he would definitely exclaim, "Man you have done a hell of a job."

Thirdly, I was able to post in Hindi. There is so much talk about promoting Hindi. I am in the middle of the Book, British Paramountancy and Indian Renaissance. In the first three chapters, there is discussion on the English in colonial India. There is another essay which I have downloaded from net titled "A dubious Qoutation". I desire to pass a comment on that. The book that I have mentioned is written by a nationalist historian Dr. R. C. Majumdar. It is worth reading. It is astonishing to learn the detail about how English was introduced in India. Then the dichotomy will be revealed. Then one can see how dubious are the talks and desires of the people who want to promote the national language and how they have failed in nurturing sincere desires. Is it also a part of Apadadharma? Well, what PaP can be there when Ganga is following?

Saturday, June 04, 2005

The Alchemy of Desire

The address of the web site of Tarun Tejpal the author of The Alchemy of Desire is as follows:

Site address: http://www.taruntejpal.com/default.htm

The Indian edition of this book costs Rs. 500/-

I went to buy it but returned buying some other books.

The author seems to have launched his site for promoting his book. However, in the biography link, he has given his other writeups also. It is good to have this site because when Tehlka was in news, being over conscious, I abstained from accessing it. Later when I tried to open, it did not download. Here, this site just appears without efforts.

Another section section contain the comment of the general readers which include leading names from the world of art, cinema, intellectual world and others.

(Category: Resources on Net)

Sunday, May 29, 2005

Friday, May 20, 2005

Are You Ready

(Refer here to A New Discovery – A relieving letter, Friday, December 08, 2000 5:05:54 AM.)

It is the only real truth. You say your thing forcefully. You make your own virtues. You free yourself from the set of values which the society is professing. You try to discern the real set of values. They are based on opportunism.

I still believe in the existence of god. My god is not what the set of values the society profess. My god is a center of power which is there to help you and work for you. Rather you are here to use him. Just use him. You act like Dr. Fastus. You god is not a satin. He is god. He will show the right path. He is not bound by the values as professed by the society. He helps those who help themselves. He is having his own way of rewarding. He does not evaluate you as per the standards of the society. If you try to be humble it is not that you do it to appease the god. You act in that manner only to appease the society. If you want to appease the god then do that what the people whose names are recorded in history had done. Just achieve whatsoever you want to achieve.

Demand from the god. Sit and ask for his help and then start working. He would help you. He is the real creator. He is the real doer. Be his medium. Be his machine. Do not think much. Have faith in Him. He knows all. He is just waiting for you to identify him. He does not reveal himself in scriptures. He reveals himself directly to the seeker. The books written about the saints are written by men. Nanak did not speak to appease the people. He was rather chiding the people. Did Chaitanya care what the people were saying about him? People call such people as mad. They call Hitler an oppressor. They praise Mahatma Gandhi. But try to see the clippings. What message do they give? Was not Nehru as great as Gandhi was? People would like to call Mahatma Gandhi a saint but not Nehru. The simple soldier who dies on the border is not the saint but Gandhi is. This is what the fact is. Be a real soldier. Soldier dies may be for his bread or his nation. He is called a martyr. He is not called a saint. So do not think much what the scriptures say. Believe in yourself. Believe it that you have discovered the real truth. Achieve the uncharted success. Buddha claims to have learned about the real truth. Mahavira claimed to have learned about the real truth. But in what form do you find their followers. The Jains are rich. What actually do they do? They are sought not because they are the followers of Jainism but because of their money. Where are the Buddhists? They are admired because they had the esoteric powers. What about Tibet? Is Buddha not helping them? Is Shangila of no help to them?

Keep on reading more and more history. Just do not remain confined to Indian history. Learn about the history of other nations and other people. Learn about other subjects also.

Develop the idea given in this write up. Do not get worried my what is happening between you and them. Just believe in yourself. ---------------------------------------- (Personal lines omitted). Why do you wait that God would do the justice? ------------------ (Personal Lines omitted). Do you see that schemer? It seems that he also have the similar thoughts. It is why that when he has to attend to his agenda he justifies his entire act in the name of necessity.

Why do you try the unimaginable today? Be strict with your self also. ARE YOU READY?
____
Old Bag

Expression on History reading. Wednesday, July 11, 2001

I read about Peter of Russia from Fisher. What is written on him? It was a story of a man who did not have virtue. He had the courage. He lived to kill.


What actually is recorded in history? it is always similar type of records. They are the records of the men who had invaded, oppressed killed and ravaged. They are admired even for their inhuman acts. They are shown to have brought civilization towards perfection.


What is happening even today? There are rich and poor people. There are oppressed and oppressors. The system of government virtually suffocates. It is not for the benefit of the man. It is just providing a situation in which you can live for the next day. If you want to achieve something you should be oppressive, scheming and lucky. If you are not lucky then you just cry because of the pain. Riots take place. People are killed. A man with money ride over you. People try to acquire power not because they have divine origin but it is useful to be in power. The human beings keep on living under the mirage of living a better tomorrow. The saints fool you. They say that god is there so be nice.
____
Old Bag

Thoughtless Me Or HE


Inspite of the earlier experiences, the man is prone to repeat his mistakes. It is mark of some a major flaw in the personality of the person. The main reasons of such causes are his earlier training and experiences especially form his childhood years. When the man becomes mature, he realises and discovers the flaws but he finds it difficult to overcome them.

The solution to his problems can only be found in the strict discipline.
Other way out is stoic approach to one own self.

The third approach is the psychological approach.

In any case, only his own will power can provide the protection from the maladies from which the man is suffering. The question of will power is bit mystic in nature. It takes one to the question of God. God worship then becomes one more solution. The god affairs give the hint of delays. It does not result into immediate result and rather it works with lot of procrastination, which rather increase the problem of the man.

In defence of God, it can be said that the creator does not go against his own creation. The laws, which he had made, he permits them to work and does not interfere in them. If the person is suffering from the maladies, it is he who is to blame.

But the person would like to ask the question, that first of all why he was not informed of the liabilities of the action on his part. He would like to argue that if he was doing any thing as per the law of the nature and then why was there no caution. Why was he not told about the language by which he could judge and understand the liabilities? Why are the remedies so difficult? Why are the remedies not readily made available to him? All these questions have strength and validity.

It seems that the human existence is a punishment. In it, there is chance of partiality. Some of the people get the access to the remedies and easily get themselves absolved of their liabilities and others are intentionally made to suffer. Why does every one not get the food? Why minimum required facilities are not available to every one? Why am I better than him but worst than him? It seems that even the God is not fully perfect.

____
Old Bag

Walking Theories

For some days I have been again going for walk. It is a good experience. On the walk I am getting the mystic thoughts once again. I had been passing through the phase of acute procrastination. It was as a remedy that I had started the walk again. On the walk I am again getting the thoughts which I call the mystic thoughts.

I ponder upon the real nature of life. I try to understand the real nature of soul and the human existence. During the internal discourse I get the new vision this time. I am able to conclude that all the confusion about the validity of the soul and spirituality is the result of the confusion of the brain or the carnal existence. That confusion is normal feature of the carnal existence. There is existence of soul and all the souls are equal. Those who seem to be totally manipulative, abusive and lecherous are just responding to the confusions of the carnal existence. They all suffer from the inner fight of soul and the human existence.

The theory of this confusion is based on other theory. The main theory is that whatsoever has its beginning in birth, it will ultimately perish. The thing which is born is always in flux. As it is said in Buddhism that you are different from what you were a second before. Anything which is passing through this existence of birth and death, will suffer the confusion. That which is born, marches strongly towards its end. Therefore, whatever is true for it for this second, it does not remain true with the next second. Buddha said to Ananda, "See what is here in my hand is true. The leaves which are lying on the ground were true. The leaves on the tree are true. But our perception of truth is confined only to those leaves which are in our hand. Hence, anything which is flux, it bound to change and this change is cause of confusion.

Another theory which I have developed during the internal discourse is that the nature is all a result of soul. The man’s soul and the soul of nature are at perennial competition with each other. The nature tries to impose her forces on the carnal existence which is her creation. The soul which gives life try to use the time of her existence in the carnal form and is given the task to become stronger than the soul of the nature. The scientists try to overcome the shortcomings of the nature or try to understand the laws of nature in order to settle their confusion. In the process they learn about the weakness in their understanding. They are trying to get the material knowledge but it is the silent existence in them which is most benefited from the efforts of the brain which again is a carnal and perishable existence. When the scientist dies, he is not able to enjoy the fruits of his discoveries. It is his successors who are benefited from the knowledge which he had gathered from the womb of nature. It is wrong to say that he had lost all when he dies. Actually, it his soul which is benefited from his efforts. The other souls try to get the benefit from the knowledge which he leaves behind for the posterity.

With in few years we are going to gather so much knowledge about the nature that no one man can in his life time be able to learn whole of the knowledge which the humanity is able to gather through her scientific procedures. Does that mean that after some time we will be not able to benefited from the knowledge gather from science. No it is not true. It is the soul which is benefited from the knowledge and when that soul again come back to the earth it will be in a position to enjoy that knowledge. Actually the soul of the nature is the standard for the soul living in carnal existences to achieve.
____
Old Bag

Thursday, May 19, 2005

It is better not to seek some answers

Such questions should never be asked answer to which might destroy some existing setup. Was the creation of Pakistan justified? Now if the answer to such question is negative, then what will be the result? Pakistan is in existence for fifty two years by now. They had raised such people who are there because Pakistan is there. Then should one avoid asking this question? The answer to the first question can be big no. But should the question still be asked? The answer to the preceding question is yes. Today if some answer negates the existence of any setup, then we are enough mature to decide the fate of the existence of the existing structure in fruitful manner. If the answer to the question of the justification of the Pakistan is negative, then the question will be to give a justification to the present setup of Pakistan. But then, numerous questions will also emerge which will defy any answer. However, even then answer should be sought to such questions answer to which may destroy the present structure.

Should a husband or a wife inquire about the extramarital relations of their spouses? In this case, answer can be negative. It is question of individual preferences. A person may digest a possibility of extramarital relation of his or her spouse, but not everyone should be expected to behave in the similar manner. In that case, a particular solution is expected. If that solution is expected, then some one say, that if you are going to accept the extramarital relation of your spouse then where is the question of inquiring about the possibility of the existence of extramarital relation of your spouse. Then the question and possibility will rise to give the justification to the concept of the extramarital relation. The argument will be sought from the antiquity. Hence, it is better not to learn about such questions and their answers, which may destroy the existence of the present setup.
No doubt, If you dislike duality and seek truth, then sometime the truth hurts.
_________
Category: OLD BAG

Assumption is the Real Truth

I am convinced of the existence of something near to soul. This is the only level to which I have reached. I have the impression that there is further place to go over but I am not just qualified to reach there. Why do I believe in soul? The conclusion is based on the circumstantial evidences, experiences in spiritualism, and the logic. The logic worked on the bases of assumption. My faith in the existence of soul is also logical hence, based on assumption. Those who refute to accept the existence of soul, they also base their conclusion on assumption. You change the selection of your assumption and you may be atheist or theist on the same hand.
_________
Category: OLD BAG